add Scala FAQ entry about nilary vs nullary methods #3052
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
SethTisue
force-pushed
the
faq-nilary-nullary
branch
from
a3c5206 to
bc1a682
Compare
BalmungSan
approved these changes
Aug 9, 2024
|
I only wish we had started saying "parameterless" for nilary and "parameterlistless" for nullary. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
My experience on Discord is that this is in fact asked often enough to merit a spot in the FAQ.
The style guide entry the answer points to could definitely use improvement. I've opened a separate PR on that: #3053. But in the meantime, I think it's still okay for the FAQ to link to the old version.
fyi @BalmungSan