-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
Description
Priority: P1 - Critical Quality Gap
Description:
Issue #15 "Comprehensive Test Suite Expansion" was marked as closed but the requirements were not actually met. Test coverage decreased rather than expanded, and several key requirements remain unfulfilled.
Current Problematic State:
- ❌ Test file count DECREASED from 11 to 7 files (opposite of expansion goal)
- ❌ No evidence of >80% code coverage target being met
- ❌ 2 integration tests currently failing (Rust analysis)
- ❌ Performance benchmarking not established
- ❌ MCP tool testing not comprehensively implemented
Original Requirements Not Met:
MCP Tool Testing (Missing):
- End-to-end tests for all 18+ MCP tools
- Error condition testing and edge cases for each tool
- Parameter validation testing for all tools
- Response format validation for all tools
Integration Testing (Insufficient):
- Multi-language repository testing
- Large codebase performance testing
- Memory usage and leak detection
- Concurrent request handling testing
Performance Benchmarking (Missing):
- Establish parsing performance benchmarks for each language
- Create analysis tool performance metrics baseline
- Implement memory usage profiling
- Set up scalability testing with large repositories
- Performance regression detection in CI
Quality Metrics (Unverified):
- Achieve and verify >80% code coverage across all crates
- Set up automated coverage reporting
- API compatibility testing between versions
- Documentation accuracy testing
Test Infrastructure Improvements:
- Create comprehensive test framework in
tests/mcp_tools/test_framework.rs - Add property-based testing for parser correctness
- Create test data generation for various code patterns
- Set up integration test environment automation
Missing Test Categories:
- Comprehensive parser correctness tests for each language
- Cross-language analysis consistency tests
- Error handling and recovery tests
- Configuration and environment tests
- Security analysis accuracy tests
Fix Current Failing Tests:
- Fix 2 failing Rust integration tests
- Ensure all existing tests pass consistently
- Add missing test assertions that were overlooked
Code Coverage Implementation:
- Set up code coverage collection (tarpaulin or similar)
- Generate coverage reports in CI
- Set coverage thresholds for each crate
- Create coverage gap analysis
Acceptance Criteria:
- >80% code coverage across all crates (verified and reported)
- All 18+ MCP tools have comprehensive test suites
- Performance benchmarks established and monitored in CI
- Integration tests for complex multi-language scenarios
- All tests pass consistently
- Test count significantly exceeds original 11 files
- Automated testing pipeline with quality gates
Implementation Plan:
Phase 1: Fix Current Issues (Week 1)
- Fix 2 failing Rust tests
- Set up code coverage collection
- Audit current test gaps
Phase 2: MCP Tool Testing (Week 2-3)
- Create comprehensive test suite for each MCP tool
- Add parameter validation and error condition tests
- Test response format validation
Phase 3: Performance & Integration (Week 3-4)
- Establish performance benchmarks
- Create large-scale integration tests
- Memory and concurrency testing
Phase 4: Quality Assurance (Week 4)
- Achieve >80% coverage target
- Set up automated quality gates
- Documentation and final validation
Quality Gates:
- Minimum 80% code coverage before PR merge
- All MCP tools must have test coverage
- Performance benchmarks must not regress
- Integration tests must pass for all supported languages
Technical Implementation:
- Expand
tests/mcp_tools/directory structure - Create
tests/performance/for benchmarking - Add
tests/coverage/for coverage analysis - Enhance
tests/integration/with comprehensive scenarios
Estimated Timeline: 4 weeks