Skip to content

Conversation

@ehuss
Copy link
Contributor

@ehuss ehuss commented Mar 28, 2022

Currently if one tries to build std documentation for a no_std target, you get a confusing error message:

error: The argument '--package [<SPEC>...]' was provided more than once, but cannot be used multiple times

This is because std_cargo has a built-in -p alloc argument that conflicts with the cargo rustdoc command used in the Std doc step.

This just adds a better error message in this scenario. It may be possible to fix this correctly, but that would likely be a bit more of an invasive change that I don't have time for right now.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Mar 28, 2022
@Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 29, 2022

📌 Commit 935e281 has been approved by Dylan-DPC

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 29, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 29, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 935e281 with merge ad5b6f6...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 29, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Dylan-DPC
Pushing ad5b6f6 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Mar 29, 2022
@bors bors merged commit ad5b6f6 into rust-lang:master Mar 29, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.61.0 milestone Mar 29, 2022
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (ad5b6f6): comparison url.

Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant results. 7 results were found to be statistically significant but too small to be relevant.

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants