-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
Improve --check-cfg
implementation
#94175
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
aa754d7
to
f36c077
Compare
I've address all review comments, except for #94175 (comment) and #94175 (comment) where I left a comment. I also would like to apologies for my English mistakes, it's not my native language. I will try my best to make sure these mistakes doesn't happen again. @rustbot ready |
Fixed #94175 (comment) and added a note when no value is expected ecd3a65. @rustbot ready |
r=me with the remaining comments addressed and commits squashed appropriately. |
ecd3a65
to
6e3f642
Compare
Fixed last remaining comments and squashed to 5 commits. This is ready for r=you. @rustbot ready |
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit 6e3f642 has been approved by |
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit a556a2a has been approved by |
⌛ Testing commit a556a2a with merge d0a34dc40eba51c4cd4173f8fb56b4c562209c90... |
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
@bors retry (crates.io down) |
This pull-request is a mix of improvements regarding the
--check-cfg
implementation:Option
instead of separate bool)r? @petrochenkov