Skip to content

Conversation

TaKO8Ki
Copy link
Member

@TaKO8Ki TaKO8Ki commented Oct 23, 2021

closes #88138

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @wesleywiser

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Oct 23, 2021
@apiraino apiraino added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Oct 28, 2021
@TaKO8Ki TaKO8Ki requested a review from wesleywiser October 29, 2021 03:22
@TaKO8Ki
Copy link
Member Author

TaKO8Ki commented Nov 4, 2021

r? @estebank

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned estebank and unassigned wesleywiser Nov 4, 2021
@TaKO8Ki TaKO8Ki requested a review from estebank November 7, 2021 11:19
@TaKO8Ki
Copy link
Member Author

TaKO8Ki commented Nov 10, 2021

Could you review this PR? @wesleywiser @estebank

@wesleywiser
Copy link
Member

Looks good to me. Thanks @TaKO8Ki!

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 11, 2021

📌 Commit 3e43de4 has been approved by wesleywiser

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 11, 2021
@TaKO8Ki
Copy link
Member Author

TaKO8Ki commented Nov 11, 2021

@wesleywiser Thank you!

visitor.r.local_def_id(unused.use_tree_id).to_def_id(),
);
let test_module_span = match module_to_string(parent_module) {
Some(module) if module.contains("test") => Some(parent_module.span),
Copy link
Contributor

@rhysd rhysd Nov 11, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@TaKO8Ki @wesleywiser

If my understanding is correct, this would detect modules like the followings as 'test' module.

mod fastest_search {
  // ...
}
mod sohrtest_path {
  // ...
}
mod bytestring {
  // ...
}

Is it intentional? I'm afraid that this loose check causes many false positives. I'd recommend to check more strictly like module == "test" || module == "tests".

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@wesleywiser I fixed this false positive. Could you review again?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As of c597dc8, it looks good to me 👍

@TaKO8Ki TaKO8Ki requested a review from wesleywiser November 11, 2021 05:48
@TaKO8Ki
Copy link
Member Author

TaKO8Ki commented Nov 11, 2021

@bors r-

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Nov 11, 2021
@TaKO8Ki
Copy link
Member Author

TaKO8Ki commented Nov 19, 2021

Could you review this PR again? @wesleywiser

@TaKO8Ki TaKO8Ki requested review from estebank and removed request for estebank December 4, 2021 12:42
@TaKO8Ki TaKO8Ki closed this Dec 11, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Unused import warning in a test could suggest #[cfg(test)]
8 participants