Skip to content

Conversation

@Aaron1011
Copy link
Contributor

We will never need to pop past our starting frame during token
capturing. Using an empty stack allows us to avoid pointless heap
allocations/deallocations.

We will never need to pop  past our starting frame during token
capturing. Using an empty stack allows us to avoid pointless heap
allocations/deallocations.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @ecstatic-morse

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jan 8, 2021
@Aaron1011
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Awaiting bors try build completion.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 8, 2021

⌛ Trying commit 7b36408 with merge e63d87c7d985a3b28c39a68e1772b35a5cc24e72...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 9, 2021

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: e63d87c7d985a3b28c39a68e1772b35a5cc24e72 (e63d87c7d985a3b28c39a68e1772b35a5cc24e72)

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Queued e63d87c7d985a3b28c39a68e1772b35a5cc24e72 with parent 26438b4, future comparison URL.

@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jan 9, 2021
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking try commit (e63d87c7d985a3b28c39a68e1772b35a5cc24e72): comparison url.

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. Please note that if the perf results are neutral, you should likely undo the rollup=never given below by specifying rollup- to bors.

Importantly, though, if the results of this run are non-neutral do not roll this PR up -- it will mask other regressions or improvements in the roll up.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-perf

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jan 9, 2021
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

r? @petrochenkov

@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 9, 2021

📌 Commit 7b36408 has been approved by petrochenkov

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 9, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 9, 2021

⌛ Testing commit 7b36408 with merge 6184f23...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 9, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: petrochenkov
Pushing 6184f23 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jan 9, 2021
@bors bors merged commit 6184f23 into rust-lang:master Jan 9, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.51.0 milestone Jan 9, 2021
Aaron1011 added a commit to Aaron1011/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 28, 2021
Reverts PR rust-lang#80830
Fixes taiki-e/pin-project#312

We can have an arbitrary number of `None`-delimited group frames pushed
on the stack due to proc-macro invocations, which can legally be exited.
Attempting to account for this would add a lot of complexity for a tiny
performance gain, so let's just use the original strategy.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants