Skip to content

Conversation

RalfJung
Copy link
Member

This seems to sometimes confused people, and generally seems reasonable to state in the top-level summary of the type.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @hanna-kruppe

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 16, 2020
@RalfJung RalfJung force-pushed the manually-drop-docs branch from 52480b3 to 993c448 Compare May 16, 2020 17:50
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

Seems like hopefully this will help with the confusion at least a little...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 16, 2020

📌 Commit 993c448 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 16, 2020
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 17, 2020
Rollup of 4 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#72233 (Fix {:#?} representation of proc_macro::Literal)
 - rust-lang#72277 (emphasize that ManuallyDrop is safe-to-access and unsafe-to-drop)
 - rust-lang#72281 (Fix whitespace in `?Sized` structured suggestion)
 - rust-lang#72282 (Fix issue number typo in note)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit 444f449 into rust-lang:master May 17, 2020
@RalfJung RalfJung deleted the manually-drop-docs branch May 17, 2020 08:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants