Skip to content

Conversation

Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

This can be kept within the codegen backend crates entirely -- there's no reason for us to create it outside and attempt to hold it in the (global) context.

Changes here aren't really too easily reviewable I suspect -- not sure if they can be cleaned up by splitting into more commits though, it's just hard to reason about Box<Any> in general. If there are thoughts though I'd be happy to hear them.

The primary goal of this PR is to get rid of the field on rustc_interface::Queries.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @eddyb

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 25, 2019
@rust-highfive

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-highfive

This comment has been minimized.

This can be kept within the codegen backend crates entirely
Copy link
Member

@eddyb eddyb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM (cc @Zoxc)

@eddyb
Copy link
Member

eddyb commented Sep 26, 2019

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 26, 2019

📌 Commit b8a040f has been approved by eddyb

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 26, 2019
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2019
Remove tx_to_llvm_workers from TyCtxt

This can be kept within the codegen backend crates entirely -- there's no reason for us to create it outside and attempt to hold it in the (global) context.

Changes here aren't really too easily reviewable I suspect -- not sure if they can be cleaned up by splitting into more commits though, it's just hard to reason about `Box<Any>` in general. If there are thoughts though I'd be happy to hear them.

The primary goal of this PR is to get rid of the field on `rustc_interface::Queries`.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2019
Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #64221 ( Rust 2015: No longer downgrade NLL errors)
 - #64772 (Remove tx_to_llvm_workers from TyCtxt)
 - #64783 (Fix issue #64732)
 - #64787 (Fix ExitStatus on Fuchsia)
 - #64812 (Add test for E0543)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2019
Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #64221 ( Rust 2015: No longer downgrade NLL errors)
 - #64772 (Remove tx_to_llvm_workers from TyCtxt)
 - #64783 (Fix issue #64732)
 - #64787 (Fix ExitStatus on Fuchsia)
 - #64812 (Add test for E0543)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit b8a040f into rust-lang:master Sep 27, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants