Skip to content

[beta] Bootstrap from release artifacts #47187

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 8, 2018
Merged

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

Routine update from dev to non-dev now that 1.23.0 is published

Routine update from dev to non-dev now that 1.23.0 is published
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 4, 2018

📌 Commit 079bcd9 has been approved by alexcrichton

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @nikomatsakis

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

warning Warning warning

  • Pull requests are usually filed against the master branch for this repo, but this one is against beta. Please double check that you specified the right target!

@kennytm kennytm added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Jan 4, 2018
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 8, 2018

⌛ Testing commit 079bcd9 with merge 2a65c6a...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2018
[beta] Bootstrap from release artifacts

Routine update from dev to non-dev now that 1.23.0 is published
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 8, 2018

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: alexcrichton
Pushing 2a65c6a to beta...

@bors bors merged commit 079bcd9 into rust-lang:beta Jan 8, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants