Skip to content

Clarify where is_import is used #47095

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 1, 2018
Merged

Conversation

leoyvens
Copy link
Contributor

So it's not mistaken for dead code.

So it's not mistaken for dead code.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @eddyb

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ pub struct Export {
/// We include non-`pub` exports for hygienic macros that get used from extern crates.
pub vis: ty::Visibility,
/// True if from a `use` or and `extern crate`.
/// Used in rustdoc.
pub is_import: bool,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can't this be checked by way of tcx.def_key(export.def.def_id()).parent? Or by adding a DefId of the export itself, and comparing that to export.def.def_id().

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, this should be removable with a little refactoring in rustdoc, opened #47100.

@kennytm kennytm added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Dec 31, 2017
@kennytm
Copy link
Member

kennytm commented Dec 31, 2017

cc @jseyfried who added is_import in #46419.

@jseyfried
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 1, 2018

📌 Commit f6ff377 has been approved by jseyfried

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 1, 2018

⌛ Testing commit f6ff377 with merge bc1dda4...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 1, 2018
Clarify where `is_import` is used

So it's not mistaken for dead code.
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 1, 2018

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: jseyfried
Pushing bc1dda4 to master...

@bors bors merged commit f6ff377 into rust-lang:master Jan 1, 2018
@leoyvens leoyvens deleted the clarify-is-import branch March 7, 2018 10:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants