doc: fix swapped docs for intro_ptr and intro_raw of CString #28788
Conversation
|
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
|
Since |
|
I thought that it's better for the deprecated But do you agree that the documentation as it is now is inconsistent? Especially considering the documentation of |
|
I think it's better. Either way, the unstable & deprecated methods will be removed relatively quickly. |
|
There certainly is no reason why the Edit: edited the initial comment because I confused |
tsurai
changed the title
|
@bors r+ rollup Great, let's go! |
|
📌 Commit 25c2134 has been approved by |
Please correct me if I confused something but the documentation for ```into_ptr``` and ```into_raw``` of ```CString``` seem to be swapped as the docs for ```into_ptr``` mentions ```into_raw``` and vice versa. Update: I actually meant ```into_ptr``` and ```into_raw``` NOT ```from_*```
Please correct me if I confused something but the documentation for ```into_ptr``` and ```into_raw``` of ```CString``` seem to be swapped as the docs for ```into_ptr``` mentions ```into_raw``` and vice versa. Update: I actually meant ```into_ptr``` and ```into_raw``` NOT ```from_*```
Please correct me if I confused something but the documentation for
into_ptrandinto_rawofCStringseem to be swapped as the docs forinto_ptrmentionsinto_rawand vice versa.Update: I actually meant
into_ptrandinto_rawNOTfrom_*