Skip to content

TRPL: Tiny incoherence in UFCS example. #24891

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 28, 2015
Merged

TRPL: Tiny incoherence in UFCS example. #24891

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 28, 2015

Conversation

tcard
Copy link
Contributor

@tcard tcard commented Apr 28, 2015

Type should be Trait to match the next example line.

r? @steveklabnik

`Type` should be `Trait` to match the next example line.

r? @steveklabnik
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @steveklabnik (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. The way Github handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see CONTRIBUTING.md for more information.

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 28, 2015

📌 Commit df1768d has been approved by steveklabnik

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 28, 2015

⌛ Testing commit df1768d with merge d8b64c7...

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

ahhh nice catch, thank you!

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2015
`Type` should be `Trait` to match the next example line.

r? @steveklabnik
@bors bors merged commit df1768d into rust-lang:master Apr 28, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants