library: std: sys: pal: uefi: Add some comments #146964
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
I seemed to have forgotten that since I am using GET_PROTOCOL attribute for the std usecases, I did not need to close the protocols explicitly. So adding these comments as a note to future self not to waste time on the same thing again. Signed-off-by: Ayush Singh <[email protected]>
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum. Use |
|
@bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 24, 2025
library: std: sys: pal: uefi: Add some comments I seemed to have forgotten that since I am using GET_PROTOCOL attribute for the std usecases, I did not need to close the protocols explicitly. So adding these comments as a note to future self not to waste time on the same thing again.
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 24, 2025
Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - #146711 (fix 2 borrowck issues) - #146735 (unstably constify float mul_add methods) - #146857 (revert change removing `has_infer` check. Commit conservatively patch…) - #146897 (fix ICE in rustdoc::invalid_html_tags) - #146915 (Make missed precondition-free float intrinsics safe) - #146932 (Switch next-solver related rustc dependencies of r-a to crates.io ones) - #146959 (temporary-lifetime-extension-tuple-ctor.rs: make usable on all editions) - #146964 (library: std: sys: pal: uefi: Add some comments) - #146969 (const-eval: better wording for errors involving maybe-null pointers) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 24, 2025
Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - #146711 (fix 2 borrowck issues) - #146857 (revert change removing `has_infer` check. Commit conservatively patch…) - #146897 (fix ICE in rustdoc::invalid_html_tags) - #146915 (Make missed precondition-free float intrinsics safe) - #146932 (Switch next-solver related rustc dependencies of r-a to crates.io ones) - #146959 (temporary-lifetime-extension-tuple-ctor.rs: make usable on all editions) - #146964 (library: std: sys: pal: uefi: Add some comments) - #146969 (const-eval: better wording for errors involving maybe-null pointers) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 24, 2025
Rollup merge of #146964 - Ayush1325:close-protocol, r=joboet library: std: sys: pal: uefi: Add some comments I seemed to have forgotten that since I am using GET_PROTOCOL attribute for the std usecases, I did not need to close the protocols explicitly. So adding these comments as a note to future self not to waste time on the same thing again.
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to rust-lang/rust-analyzer
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 25, 2025
Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang/rust#146711 (fix 2 borrowck issues) - rust-lang/rust#146857 (revert change removing `has_infer` check. Commit conservatively patch…) - rust-lang/rust#146897 (fix ICE in rustdoc::invalid_html_tags) - rust-lang/rust#146915 (Make missed precondition-free float intrinsics safe) - rust-lang/rust#146932 (Switch next-solver related rustc dependencies of r-a to crates.io ones) - rust-lang/rust#146959 (temporary-lifetime-extension-tuple-ctor.rs: make usable on all editions) - rust-lang/rust#146964 (library: std: sys: pal: uefi: Add some comments) - rust-lang/rust#146969 (const-eval: better wording for errors involving maybe-null pointers) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to model-checking/verify-rust-std
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 9, 2025
library: std: sys: pal: uefi: Add some comments I seemed to have forgotten that since I am using GET_PROTOCOL attribute for the std usecases, I did not need to close the protocols explicitly. So adding these comments as a note to future self not to waste time on the same thing again.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I seemed to have forgotten that since I am using GET_PROTOCOL attribute for the std usecases, I did not need to close the protocols explicitly. So adding these comments as a note to future self not to waste time on the same thing again.