Skip to content

Improve recovery when users write where: #143065

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

Improve recovery of where:.

Fixes #143023

The erroneous suggestion was because we were seeing : then a type, which the original impl thought must be a struct field. Make this a bit more accurate by checking for a non-reserved ident (which should be a field name).

Also, make a custom parser error for where: so we can continue parsing after the colon.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 26, 2025

r? @oli-obk

rustbot has assigned @oli-obk.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jun 26, 2025
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Jun 27, 2025

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 27, 2025

📌 Commit 4e51e67 has been approved by oli-obk

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 27, 2025
GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 27, 2025
…li-obk

Improve recovery when users write `where:`

Improve recovery of `where:`.

Fixes rust-lang#143023

The erroneous suggestion was because we were seeing `:` then a type, which the original impl thought must be a struct field. Make this a bit more accurate by checking for a non-reserved ident (which should be a field name).

Also, make a custom parser error for `where:` so we can continue parsing after the colon.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 27, 2025
Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #142270 (Rustdoc js: even more typechecking improvements)
 - #142420 (Report infer ty errors during hir ty lowering)
 - #142671 (add #![rustc_no_implicit_bounds])
 - #142721 (Add tracing to `InterpCx::layout_of()` )
 - #142818 (Port `#[used]` to new attribute parsing infrastructure)
 - #143020 (codegen_fn_attrs: make comment more precise)
 - #143051 (Add tracing to `validate_operand`)
 - #143060 (Only args in main diag are saved and restored without removing the newly added ones)
 - #143065 (Improve recovery when users write `where:`)
 - #143084 (const-eval: error when initializing a static writes to that static)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Incorrect help suggestion on a syntax error in the where part of an enum
4 participants