Clean up tests/ui by removing does-nothing.rs
#123568
Merged
+1
−12
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
r? @wesleywiser rustbot has assigned @wesleywiser. Use |
rustbot
added
A-testsuite
|
r? @jieyouxu |
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #123576) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
fix: restore issues_entry_limit
wesleywiser
approved these changes
Apr 10, 2024
|
Seems fine! @bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 10, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#121884 (Port exit-code run-make test to use rust) - rust-lang#122200 (Unconditionally show update nightly hint on ICE) - rust-lang#123568 (Clean up tests/ui by removing `does-nothing.rs`) - rust-lang#123609 (Don't use bytepos offsets when computing semicolon span for removal) - rust-lang#123612 (Set target-abi module flag for RISC-V targets) - rust-lang#123633 (Store all args in the unsupported Command implementation) - rust-lang#123668 (async closure coroutine by move body MirPass refactoring) Failed merges: - rust-lang#123701 (Only assert for child/parent projection compatibility AFTER checking that theyre coming from the same place) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 10, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#123568 - Oneirical:delete-tests, r=wesleywiser Clean up tests/ui by removing `does-nothing.rs` In [a previous PR](rust-lang#123297 (comment)), it was suggested that this test be removed: > it's testing a basic diagnostic for an unknown variable (added over a decade ago for rust-lang#154) that is already covered by probably dozens or hundreds of other tests. It was then suggested that [opening a new PR](rust-lang#123563 (comment)) for this would be more organized. I'm setting this as a draft, as: 1. The tests/ui directory is rather disorganized, a large quantity of tests are not even contained inside their own directories. This PR could turn into "clean up the UI tests directory", if I were to place everything into categories (for example, everything related to CLI flags could get placed in a cli directory). 2. This will have a merge conflict with rust-lang#123563 should that get merged. I trust that _this time_, I won't run into [The Incident](rust-lang#123297 (comment)) while rebasing. Edit: Yay, I did it properly!
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In a previous PR, it was suggested that this test be removed:
It was then suggested that opening a new PR for this would be more organized.
I'm setting this as a draft, as:
versiontest run-make as an UI test #123563 should that get merged. I trust that this time, I won't run into The Incident while rebasing. Edit: Yay, I did it properly!