Skip to content

Conversation

klensy
Copy link
Contributor

@klensy klensy commented Jan 26, 2024

effectively reverts 9a8acea

r? @nikic

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jan 26, 2024
@nikic
Copy link
Contributor

nikic commented Jan 26, 2024

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 26, 2024

📌 Commit f1b5131 has been approved by nikic

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 26, 2024
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2024
llvm-wrapper: remove llvm 12 hack

effectively reverts rust-lang@9a8acea

r? `@nikic`
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#103522 (stabilise array methods)
 - rust-lang#113489 (impl `From<&[T; N]>` for `Cow<[T]>`)
 - rust-lang#119562 (Rename `pointer` field on `Pin`)
 - rust-lang#119800 (Document `rustc_index::vec::IndexVec`)
 - rust-lang#120368 (llvm-wrapper: remove llvm 12 hack)
 - rust-lang#120378 (always normalize `LoweredTy` in the new solver)
 - rust-lang#120382 (Classify closure arguments in refutable pattern in argument error)
 - rust-lang#120389 (Add fmease to the compiler review rotation)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

@bors r-
probably caused this llvm test failure? #120394 (comment)

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jan 26, 2024
@nikic
Copy link
Contributor

nikic commented Jan 26, 2024

Yes, that's how failure to run NameAnonGlobals manifests.

// before the RequiredLTOPreLinkPasses, in which case we can remove these hacks.
if (OptimizerLastEPCallbacks.empty())
NeedThinLTOBufferPasses = false;
NeedThinLTOBufferPasses = false;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe you also need to drop the OptStage != LLVMRustOptStage::PreLinkThinLTO condition above and drop the manual OptimizerLastEPCallbacks scheduling below.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Weird, locally tests/ui/sanitize/new-llvm-pass-manager-thin-lto.rs passes for me on x86_64-pc-windows-msvc.

@nikic
Copy link
Contributor

nikic commented Feb 6, 2024

@bors r+ rollup=iffy

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 6, 2024

📌 Commit ca35cfb has been approved by nikic

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Feb 6, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 6, 2024

⌛ Testing commit ca35cfb with merge 037f515...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 6, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: nikic
Pushing 037f515 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Feb 6, 2024
@bors bors merged commit 037f515 into rust-lang:master Feb 6, 2024
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.78.0 milestone Feb 6, 2024
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (037f515): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.4% [-0.4%, -0.4%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-2.5% [-2.5%, -2.5%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -2.5% [-2.5%, -2.5%] 1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 663.088s -> 661.097s (-0.30%)
Artifact size: 308.10 MiB -> 308.13 MiB (0.01%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants