Skip to content

Fix the issue of suggesting unwrap/expect for shorthand field #118413

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 29, 2023
Merged

Fix the issue of suggesting unwrap/expect for shorthand field #118413

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 29, 2023

Conversation

chenyukang
Copy link
Member

Fixes #118145

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Nov 28, 2023

r? @davidtwco

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Nov 28, 2023
@chenyukang chenyukang changed the title fix the issue of suggest unwrap/expect for shorthand field Fix the issue of suggesting unwrap/expect for shorthand field Nov 28, 2023
compiler-errors
compiler-errors approved these changes Nov 28, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@compiler-errors compiler-errors left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

r=me when green

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

It would be really cool if you checked other suggestion code for this bug as well

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 28, 2023

📌 Commit 9386e14 has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 28, 2023
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@bors rollup

@chenyukang
Copy link
Member Author

It would be really cool if you checked other suggestion code for this bug as well

I reviewed some other suggestions in this file, and added several new fix.
Not sure we have fixed all issue, is there any possible general solution?
maybe we can have a try on this scenario:

suggesting add xxx to result of "a.xxx", and a is a shorthand field we should suggest: a: a.xxx.

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

I don't know if the compiler currently has the machinery to allow us to make this fix in general :/

This is good for now. Thanks for the detailed tests.

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 29, 2023

📌 Commit 3a4edf0 has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr mentioned this pull request Nov 29, 2023
Merged
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2023
@bors
Auto merge of rust-lang#118434 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-k1upt8b, r=matth…
e9b7bf0 
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#118342 (Dont suggest `!` for path in function call if it has generic args)
 - rust-lang#118383 (Address unused tuple struct fields in the standard library)
 - rust-lang#118401 (`rustc_ast_lowering` cleanups)
 - rust-lang#118409 (format_foreign.rs: unwrap return Option value for `fn position`, as it always returns Some)
 - rust-lang#118413 (Fix the issue of suggesting unwrap/expect for shorthand field)
 - rust-lang#118425 (Update cargo)
 - rust-lang#118429 (Fix a typo in a `format_args!` note)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 8727538 into rust-lang:master Nov 29, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.76.0 milestone Nov 29, 2023
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2023
@rust-timer
Unrolled build for rust-lang#118413
e9613d3 
Rollup merge of rust-lang#118413 - chenyukang:yukang-fix-118145-unwrap-for-shorthand, r=compiler-errors

Fix the issue of suggesting unwrap/expect for shorthand field

Fixes rust-lang#118145
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@compiler-errors compiler-errors compiler-errors approved these changes

Assignees

@compiler-errors compiler-errors

Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.76.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Suggestion to add the question mark operator creates invalid code for structs that use the shorthand syntax
5 participants
@chenyukang @rustbot @compiler-errors @bors @davidtwco