Bump nightly version

[Mark-Simulacrum]

https://forge.rust-lang.org/release/process.html#bump-the-stable-version-number-t-6-days-friday-the-week-before

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

[Mark-Simulacrum]

@bors r+ rollup=never

[bors]

📌 Commit be67b7b has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit be67b7b with merge d5bdda0...

[bors]

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

[rust-log-analyzer]

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

GITHUB_ENV=/home/runner/work/_temp/_runner_file_commands/set_env_a46bcbd7-9aa2-45ca-869b-2bf476fcfcbb
GITHUB_EVENT_NAME=pull_request
GITHUB_EVENT_PATH=/home/runner/work/_temp/_github_workflow/event.json
GITHUB_GRAPHQL_URL=https://api.github.com/graphql
GITHUB_HEAD_REF=bump-version
GITHUB_JOB=pr
GITHUB_PATH=/home/runner/work/_temp/_runner_file_commands/add_path_a46bcbd7-9aa2-45ca-869b-2bf476fcfcbb
GITHUB_REF=refs/pull/117820/merge
GITHUB_REF_NAME=117820/merge
GITHUB_REF_PROTECTED=false

[rust-log-analyzer]

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

[Mark-Simulacrum]

@bors retry

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit be67b7b with merge ed086d8...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Pushing ed086d8 to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (ed086d8): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.3%	[-0.3%, -0.3%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.3%	[-0.3%, -0.3%]	1

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.4%	[0.4%, 0.4%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	1.0%	[1.0%, 1.0%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.8%	[-1.2%, -0.4%]	7
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.2%	[-3.2%, -3.2%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.7%	[-1.2%, 0.4%]	8

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.4%	[0.4%, 0.4%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.5%	[-0.5%, -0.4%]	6
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.3%	[-0.5%, 0.4%]	7

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 673.294s -> 673.486s (0.03%)
Artifact size: 311.12 MiB -> 311.11 MiB (-0.00%)