Skip to content

Update LLVM submodule #103479

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 30, 2022
Merged

Update LLVM submodule #103479

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 30, 2022

Conversation

nikic
Copy link
Contributor

@nikic nikic commented Oct 24, 2022

Merge upstream release/15.x branch.

Fixes #102738.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @cuviper

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

⚠️ Warning ⚠️

  • These commits modify submodules.

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Oct 24, 2022
@cuviper
Copy link
Member

cuviper commented Oct 24, 2022

@bors r+ rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 24, 2022

📌 Commit 3f19fa4 has been approved by cuviper

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 24, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 30, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 3f19fa4 with merge 77e57db...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 30, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: cuviper
Pushing 77e57db to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Oct 30, 2022
@bors bors merged commit 77e57db into rust-lang:master Oct 30, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.67.0 milestone Oct 30, 2022
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (77e57db): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-1.3% [-1.4%, -1.2%] 2
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-3.4% [-3.9%, -3.1%] 6
All ❌✅ (primary) -1.3% [-1.4%, -1.2%] 2

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.6% [2.6%, 2.6%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

@nikic
Copy link
Contributor Author

nikic commented Oct 31, 2022

Didn't really expect a compile-time change here. Most likely culprit for the improvements is rust-lang/llvm-project@f3c5289.

Aaron1011 pushed a commit to Aaron1011/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2023
Update LLVM submodule

Merge upstream `release/15.x` branch.

Fixes rust-lang#102738.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Intrinsic name not mangled correctly for type arguments
6 participants