-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
thread 'main' panicked at 'assertion failed: self.tcx.sess.err_count() > 0', librustc_typeck/check/mod.rs:3783:19 #50581
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Labels
C-bug
Category: This is a bug.
I-ICE
Issue: The compiler panicked, giving an Internal Compilation Error (ICE) ❄️
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Comments
kennytm
added a commit
to kennytm/rust
that referenced
this issue
May 22, 2018
…woerister CheckLoopVisitor: also visit closure arguments This turns the ICE rust-lang#50581 in this code: ```rust fn main() { |_: [u8; break]| (); } ``` from ``` 'assertion failed: self.tcx.sess.err_count() > 0', librustc_typeck/check/mod.rs ``` to ``` librustc_mir/hair/cx/expr.rs:543: invalid loop id for break: not inside loop scope ``` which is an ICE as well but at a later stage during compilation and most importantly fixes of bug rust-lang#50576 will fix this as well. As this "only" moves an ICE to a later stage, I didn't add any tests. Now I have manually verified the default impls of the visitor trait to check whether we have missed any other opportunity to visit more stuff and coudln't find anything (except the missing `break` visit I've fixed in rust-lang#50829 but that one was already r+'d so I didn't want to push more commits).
est31
added a commit
to est31/rust
that referenced
this issue
May 26, 2018
Lone breaks outside of loops create errors in the loop check pass but as they are not fatal, compilation continues. MIR building code assumes all HIR break statements to point to valid locations and fires ICEs if this assumption is violated. In normal compilation, this causes no issues, as code apparently prevents MIR from being built if errors are present. However, before that, typecheck runs and with it MIR const eval. Here we operate differently from normal compilation: it doesn't check for any errors except for type checker ones and then directly builds the MIR. This constellation causes an ICE-on-error if bogus break statements are being put into array length expressions. This commit fixes this ICE by letting typecheck fail if bogus break statements are encountered. This way, MIR const eval fails cleanly with a type check error. Fixes rust-lang#50576 Fixes rust-lang#50581
kennytm
added a commit
to kennytm/rust
that referenced
this issue
May 26, 2018
Fail typecheck if we encounter a bogus break Lone breaks outside of loops create errors in the loop check pass but as they are not fatal, compilation continues. MIR building code assumes all HIR break statements to point to valid locations and fires ICEs if this assumption is violated. In normal compilation, this causes no issues, as code apparently prevents MIR from being built if errors are present. However, before that, typecheck runs and with it MIR const eval. Here we operate differently from normal compilation: it doesn't check for any errors except for type checker ones and then directly builds the MIR. This constellation causes an ICE-on-error if bogus break statements are being put into array length expressions. This commit fixes this ICE by letting typecheck fail if bogus break statements are encountered. This way, MIR const eval fails cleanly with a type check error. Fixes rust-lang#50576 Fixes rust-lang#50581
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
C-bug
Category: This is a bug.
I-ICE
Issue: The compiler panicked, giving an Internal Compilation Error (ICE) ❄️
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Input:
Output:
Complete output
On commit c166b03.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: