Redefining range in this rust_book example may be confusing

[ghost]

here: http://doc.rust-lang.org/book/iterators.html
this example will redefine the function range:

let mut range = range(0, 10);

loop {
    match range.next() {
        Some(x) => {
            println!("{}", x);
        },
        None => { break }
    }
}

so if I add the following(in the same main.rs):

    let nums = vec![1, 2, 3];
    for x in range(0, 10) {
        println!("{}", x);
    }

the error is:

src/main.rs:19:14: 19:26 error: expected function, found `core::iter::Range<_>`
src/main.rs:19     for x in range(0, 10) {

Is there a way to turn on a warning when such overrides happen? Something that says that this line "overwrites" previous definition of "range"(and maybe point to previous definition too), even though it's true only for a limited(local) scope. (tried to look at rustc -W help)

To avoid confusion, I suggest using a different binding name in that example.
Thoughts?

Thanks.

EDIT:
12 places where range is a binding thus overriding the function with the same name:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=%22let+mut+range%22&type=Code
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=%22let+range%22&type=Code