You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
I was reading the asm documentation and I stumbled upon this part:
Moreover, on x86 when using the default Intel syntax, due to [an LLVM bug], you shouldn't use labels exclusively made of `0` and `1` digits, e.g. `0`, `11` or `101010`, as they may end up being interpreted as binary values. Using `options(att_syntax)` will avoid any ambiguity, but that affects the syntax of the _entire_`asm!` block. (See [Options](#options), below, for more on `options`.)
[an LLVM bug]: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36144
Hi,
I was reading the asm documentation and I stumbled upon this part:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-by-example/blob/master/src/unsafe/asm.md?plain=1#L415
However, looking at the bug tracker, this bugs seems to have been closed some years ago.
The origin seems to come from rust-lang/rust#84015 (ping @tdelabro 😊)
Thanks and cheers !
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: