Skip to content

Conversation

dfireBird
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jul 15, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 19, 2024

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #17620) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@dfireBird dfireBird force-pushed the infer-lt branch 2 times, most recently from 6006a8e to b9e9e29 Compare July 22, 2024 16:25
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 31, 2024

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #17755) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@Veykril Veykril added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 2, 2024
@dfireBird dfireBird marked this pull request as ready for review August 15, 2024 17:49
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 16, 2024

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #17907) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@flodiebold
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

thanks!

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 16, 2024

📌 Commit 8a4261a has been approved by flodiebold

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 16, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 8a4261a with merge ed5c260...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 16, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: flodiebold
Pushing ed5c260 to master...

@bors bors merged commit ed5c260 into rust-lang:master Aug 16, 2024
@lnicola lnicola changed the title Implement lifetime inferring feat: Implement lifetime inferring Aug 16, 2024
@dfireBird dfireBird deleted the infer-lt branch August 16, 2024 15:40
@Veykril
Copy link
Member

Veykril commented Aug 19, 2024

This regressed unknown types from 41 to 62 on self somehow 🤔

@dfireBird
Copy link
Contributor Author

dfireBird commented Aug 19, 2024

There shouldn't be anything creating new TyKind::Error values. I'll check on that. Meanwhile, if you want to revert that commit we can.

@Veykril
Copy link
Member

Veykril commented Aug 20, 2024

It's fine, it only regressed on self so its likely not too bad. I imagine unification fails due to some new lifetimes now within chalk

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants