Skip to content

Conversation

ehuss
Copy link
Contributor

@ehuss ehuss commented Jun 30, 2025

New rules:

  • attributes.codegen.inline.syntax
  • attributes.codegen.inline.allowed-positions
  • attributes.codegen.inline.duplicates
  • attributes.codegen.inline.trait
  • attributes.codegen.inline.externally-exported
  • attributes.codegen.cold.intro
  • attributes.codegen.cold.syntax
  • attributes.codegen.cold.allowed-positions
  • attributes.codegen.cold.duplicates
  • attributes.codegen.cold.trait

Removed rules:

  • attributes.codegen.hint
  • attributes.codegen.hint.cold-inline
  • attributes.codegen.hint.usage --- split into the corresponding attributes

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: The marked PR is awaiting review from a maintainer label Jun 30, 2025
I didn't feel like this section was pulling its weight. It also wasn't
entirely correct.
This adds some wording that was removed from the "optimization hints"
section.
This rule did not seem to be covered elsewhere. I'm not 100% positive
this is the best way to document this, but I think it is accurate.

This is implemented in
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/5526a2f47cd676ceeedc08cf71ae75ce2e9284ae/compiler/rustc_passes/src/check_attr.rs#L482-L497
Note in particular that `inline` and similar attributes can be applied
to `async` blocks as well as to closures.  Along with the editorial
revisions, let's say that and also discuss the current limitations
that affect how these can be applied.
On lang, we had earlier made a decision about how `inline` should
apply to `async fn`.  Let's document that here.
@traviscross traviscross added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 3, 2025
Merged via the queue into rust-lang:master with commit b091a8a Sep 3, 2025
5 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-review Status: The marked PR is awaiting review from a maintainer label Sep 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants