Skip to content

Move element-specific functions to traits #278

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
calebzulawski merged 4 commits into from
May 31, 2022
Merged

Move element-specific functions to traits #278

calebzulawski merged 4 commits into from
May 31, 2022

Conversation

@calebzulawski
Copy link
Member

@calebzulawski calebzulawski commented Apr 15, 2022 •
edited
Loading

This serves a few purposes:

  • Deduplicates functions that are reimplemented for each element type (the docs are dramatically better)
  • Distinguishes between functions on particular element types and functions that work on any element type (also helps docs)
  • Distinguishes between functions that are slightly different between different elements (like abs)

I believe this should close #85 and #228 (and maybe #15 as well)

programmerjake
programmerjake approved these changes Apr 15, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@programmerjake programmerjake left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Other than 1 nit, lgtm!

@calebzulawski
Copy link
Member Author

calebzulawski commented Apr 16, 2022

Just upgraded the bound from Sized to Copy since some of the functions take self rather than &self (and clippy helpfully gave a warning)

@calebzulawski
Copy link
Member Author

calebzulawski commented May 20, 2022

@workingjubilee do you mind if I merge this?

@calebzulawski calebzulawski mentioned this pull request May 21, 2022
Merged
@calebzulawski calebzulawski merged commit c44a608 into master May 31, 2022
@calebzulawski calebzulawski deleted the feature/simd-traits branch October 17, 2022 00:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@programmerjake programmerjake programmerjake approved these changes

@workingjubilee workingjubilee Awaiting requested review from workingjubilee

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Improve rustdoc views

3 participants

@calebzulawski @programmerjake