Skip to content

Conversation

@Aaron1011
Copy link
Contributor

@Aaron1011 Aaron1011 commented Oct 17, 2020

Closes #1578

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 17, 2020

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #1585) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

Note that reviewers usually do not review pull requests until merge conflicts are resolved! Once you resolve the conflicts, you should change the labels applied by bors to indicate that your PR is ready for review. Post this as a comment to change the labels:

@rustbot modify labels: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-author

@RalfJung
Copy link
Member

Thanks! @bors r+

What happens when isolation is disabled?

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 18, 2020

📌 Commit 8b10dbf has been approved by RalfJung

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 18, 2020

⌛ Testing commit 8b10dbf with merge 4ad1667...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 18, 2020

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions, checks-travis, status-appveyor
Approved by: RalfJung
Pushing 4ad1667 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 4ad1667 into rust-lang:master Oct 18, 2020
@Aaron1011
Copy link
Contributor Author

@RalfJung: It prints disabled backtrace instead

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Test libstd backtrace type

3 participants