Skip to content

Conversation

@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @JohnTitor

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rtzoeller
Copy link
Contributor Author

It's not clear to me if the deprecation policy needs to be followed for tier 3 targets, or if this constant can be dropped from DragonFly immediately. There are likely some other constants which need to be removed to get the libc-test tests passing, so it'd be nice to have an official answer.

@JohnTitor
Copy link
Member

JohnTitor commented Oct 17, 2021

I'd generally deprecate items first (and then remove them) regardless of the targets as we cannot see the complete number of users depending on it (yes, it's "generally", I'm fine with removing/changing something directly if it causes a regression or something like unfortunate thing).

@JohnTitor
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 17, 2021

📌 Commit e6d308d has been approved by JohnTitor

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 17, 2021

⌛ Testing commit e6d308d with merge 913bda5...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 17, 2021

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@JohnTitor
Copy link
Member

@bors retry

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 17, 2021

⌛ Testing commit e6d308d with merge 255d84d...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 17, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions, checks-cirrus-freebsd-11, checks-cirrus-freebsd-12, checks-cirrus-freebsd-13
Approved by: JohnTitor
Pushing 255d84d to master...

@bors bors merged commit 255d84d into rust-lang:master Oct 17, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants