-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 107
ops: hibernating #324
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ops: hibernating #324
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ | ||
# Hibernating | ||
|
||
A member that will be absent or busy for an extended period of time and not able | ||
to participate in the WG during that time should put themselves in "hibernation" | ||
state. During this hibernation period: | ||
|
||
- The member will be removed from the highfive rotation. New PRs will *not* be | ||
assigned to them by the highfive bot. | ||
|
||
- The member will be removed from their GitHub teams'. `cc @rust-embedded/$team` | ||
will *not* cc them. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Will the member stay part of There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think this can be achieved with tuning your notifications. We have "watch" button on each team page. So you can subscribe to /all and unsubscribe from everything else without any membership modifications. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @hannobraun no, /all is included in "their GitHub teams". We will not modify the member repository subscriptions, but IDK if removing someone from a team has any effects on their repository subscriptions. |
||
|
||
- The member name will be removed from the list of teams in the rust-embedded/wg | ||
README, but they will be listed under the 'Hibernating' section of that | ||
README. | ||
|
||
- The member will not be counted when computing the number of votes required to | ||
reach majority on matters that concern the teams they are a member of. This | ||
includes PRs labeled `T-all` that need a decision. | ||
|
||
To enter or leave the hibernation state the member will: | ||
|
||
- Notify their teams (e.g. `cc @rust-embedded/$team`) and send a PR to | ||
rust-embedded/wg updating the README to reflect their hibernation state. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The problem is they will not be able to put themselves in "hibernation" state if they are absent or busy. The only way to enforce this is to automate the process of hibernation or at least to send a reminder time to time.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's possible to be able to (barely) keep up, while at the same time being too busy to really participate. This is my current situation, and if this PR is accepted before that situation changes, I'm going to use this mechanism to retire myself.
It's already possible to remove team members without their participation: https://github.com/rust-embedded/wg/blob/master/rfcs/0136-teams.md#removing-members
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure, but the proposal says that members that will be busy or absent (in the future) should put themselves into hibernation (now). This proposal is for them. And as @hannobraun said people currently busy may still be able to hibernate themselves.
I don't think we should do this. Hibernation should be voluntary.
I don't think we should do this either. Sending an e-mail (once) to /all when / if this (or any other significant change) occurs seems fine, though.