Derive Eq for the SPI enums #126
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This allows matching against these in downstream crates, and seems like a logical addition to the existing PartialEq (since this doesn't contain any floats, obviously).
jonas-schievink
requested review from
ilya-epifanov,
thejpster and
a team
as code owners
|
r? @japaric (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
bors bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 27, 2019
126: Derive Eq for the SPI enums r=japaric a=jonas-schievink This allows matching against these in downstream crates, and seems like a logical addition to the existing PartialEq (since this doesn't contain any floats, obviously). Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <[email protected]>
Build succeeded |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This allows matching against these in downstream crates, and seems like
a logical addition to the existing PartialEq (since this doesn't contain
any floats, obviously).