Skip to content

Conversation

@mbajur
Copy link
Contributor

@mbajur mbajur commented Apr 18, 2024

Fixes #2757

hello_job.set(priority: 2).perform_later
}.to have_enqueued_job.with_priority("2")
end

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you please add a fee more cases? I can think of a failure case when we expect priority and it wasn’t set. Also when it was set, but doesn’t match the expectation. In both examples with checks if our failure message is reasonable.
I had another scenario on the tip of my tongue, but it keeps slipping. Can you think of other cases we should cover? You can use other similar qualifiers as a source of inspiration .

By the way, does this apply to mailers?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The rest looks good, thank you!

@pirj
Copy link
Member

pirj commented Apr 18, 2024

It also makes sense to add/extend scenario here

Given a file named "spec/jobs/upload_backups_job_spec.rb" with:

Those changes will appear here https://rspec.info/features/6-1/rspec-rails/job-specs/job-spec/, and some prefer those docs to the rdoc ones.

self
end

def with_priority(priority)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Personally I would call this priority or at_priority to disambigute from with

@cmrd-senya
Copy link

ping @mbajur

@pirj pirj merged commit dc0abdb into rspec:main Aug 10, 2024
@pirj
Copy link
Member

pirj commented Aug 10, 2024

Thank you @mbajur !

@JonRowe
Copy link
Member

JonRowe commented Sep 7, 2024

Released in 7.0.0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants