Fix ill-defined assertion

[Malabarba]

It seems assertions need a pair of brakets around them.

[razum2um]

@Malabarba thanks. without brackets the assertion got inverted:

user=> (defn f [x] {:pre (not (nil? x))} (prn x))
#'user/f
user=> (f nil)
nil
nil
user=> (f 1)

AssertionError Assert failed: (nil? x)  user/f (form-init8526694049218854550.clj:1)

[bbatsov]

@razum2um Can we get a bugfix release?

[razum2um]

@bbatsov I'm sorry for 0.1.5 which really shows the lack of specs :( , but I'm short of time and besides, not really heavily using it by myself recently, but I will hopefully try my best to get it working properly and to compete at least with byebug features seen it ruby land, which I came from (and I know you mostly by rubocop ;)

tl'dr deployed 0.1.6

[bbatsov]

Thanks!

@bbatsov I'm sorry for 0.1.5 which really shows the lack of specs :( , but I'm short of time and besides, not really heavily using it by myself recently, but I will hopefully try my best to get it working properly and to compete at least with byebug features seen it ruby land, which I came from (and I know you mostly by rubocop ;)

No worries, it's pretty much the same for me. I don't use Clojure at work (much), it's mostly a hobby of mine. I have a feeling that clj-debugger might become a pretty popular tool in Clojure-land, given the absence of any serious alternatives. :-)

Btw, I work with @kossnocorp and @tukan. Small world I guess. :-)

[Malabarba]

thanks. without brackets the assertion got inverted:

Yes, that's how I found out about it. But it's very surprising that sometimes it works without the brackets. I think it's because clojure interprets (nil? x) as [nil? x].