fix a bug in typechecking partially type-annotated lambdas #1016
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
capfredf
force-pushed
the
fix-1011
branch
3 times, most recently
from
15b1db4 to
b8c9cf1
Compare
Member
Author
|
blocked by #1020 |
capfredf
force-pushed
the
fix-1011
branch
3 times, most recently
from
d1dcdca to
cf74141
Compare
When using an expected arrow type to check a lambda with not every parameter annotated, the existing annotation was thrown away, and the lambda was treated as non-annotated one. closes racket#1011
samth
approved these changes
Jan 20, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When using an expected arrow type to check a lambda with not every parameter
annotated, the existing annotation was thrown away, and the lambda was treated
as non-annotated one.
closes #1011