Make the labels of imagenet unique #4641
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
pmeier
approved these changes
Oct 18, 2021
|
Hey @datumbox! You merged this PR, but no labels were added. The list of valid labels is available at https://github.com/pytorch/vision/blob/main/.github/process_commit.py |
|
I think the bot is unhappy because we should either add a "dataset" label to this PR, or add the "prototype" tag as a secondary label. Or do both |
mszhanyi
pushed a commit
to mszhanyi/vision
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 19, 2021
facebook-github-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 19, 2021
Reviewed By: NicolasHug Differential Revision: D31758311 fbshipit-source-id: 9af9ef4dca9baca90ea003b1af5e2b9278084a8c
cyyever
pushed a commit
to cyyever/vision
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 16, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes issue with non-uniqueness of labels.
See #4640 (comment)
cc @pmeier @bjuncek