Skip to content

[ET][XNNPACK] Add support for quantized LeakyReLU #104309

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

digantdesai
Copy link
Contributor

Summary: Also adds support for backend_config

Test Plan: buck test fbcode//mode/dev-nosan fbcode//executorch/backends/xnnpack/test:

Reviewed By: mcr229

Differential Revision: D47043207

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jun 28, 2023

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/104309

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 241168c:
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D47043207

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D47043207

Copy link
Contributor

@salilsdesai salilsdesai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D47043207

1 similar comment
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D47043207

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D47043207

@digantdesai
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge this

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jun 29, 2023

❌ 🤖 pytorchbot command failed:

@pytorchbot: error: unrecognized arguments: this

usage: @pytorchbot [-h] {merge,revert,rebase,label,drci} ...

Try @pytorchbot --help for more info.

@digantdesai
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Jun 29, 2023
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: This PR has internal changes and must be landed via Phabricator

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D47043207

Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#104309

X-link: pytorch/executorch#1

Also adds support for backend_config

Test Plan: `buck test fbcode//mode/dev-nosan fbcode//executorch/backends/xnnpack/test:`

Reviewed By: mcr229

Differential Revision: D47043207

fbshipit-source-id: 3e2f7b614713ae5c3fba6ea3056376f15826de17
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D47043207

facebook-github-bot pushed a commit to pytorch/executorch that referenced this pull request Jun 30, 2023
Summary:
X-link: pytorch/pytorch#104309

Pull Request resolved: #1

Also adds support for backend_config

Reviewed By: mcr229

Differential Revision: D47043207

fbshipit-source-id: 51abd266bba7441c28578f6c58686a3d021d9d2a
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged)

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants