Duplicate registration of quantiation operators, e.g. quantized_decomposed::embedding_byte.out

[robell]

PR #3119
tidied up llama by removing a library build and op registration.

This seems to have interacted poorly with (broken the cmake flow):
examples/xnnpack/quantization/test_quantize.sh
resulting in duplicate registration of:
quantized_decomposed::embedding_byte.out

this works for the buck2 build, but not the cmake build of the library I assume because kernels/quantized/targets.bzl was updated.

removing the duplicates in kernels/quantized/quantized.yaml breaks llama2 quantization runs on xnnpack.
removing the duplicates in exir/passes/_quant_patterns_and_replacements.py causes llama testing to fail.

Can we look for a cleaner solution on quantized operator registration that is consistent across users? the xnnpack, arm backend and llama2 uses at least.

I have a patch demonstrating the problem here, as this is blocking a fairly large commit of Arm backend code:
0790d93

[robell]

@larryliu0820 @digantdesai - thoughts welcome, i assume propagating the buck2 fixes into the cmake build of the quantized op aot registration is the simple clean one, but how/where to do this cleanly is unclear to me.

[larryliu0820]

Yeah I can take a look

[larryliu0820]

I'm iterating on this PR: #3382. This should allow us to select the ops to be registered in quantized_ops_aot_lib

[robell]

Thanks, commented on a small issue on the PR.

I also find the flow with CMAKE is probably not tested even in ciflow/trunk at the moment. I've attached a small patch which enables the existing script to run, and reproduces the duplicate registration issue:
./examples/xnnpack/quantization/test_quantize.sh cmake mv2

xnnpacktest.err.txt
xnnpacktest.patch

[larryliu0820]

Thanks, commented on a small issue on the PR.

I also find the flow with CMAKE is probably not tested even in ciflow/trunk at the moment. I've attached a small patch which enables the existing script to run, and reproduces the duplicate registration issue: ./examples/xnnpack/quantization/test_quantize.sh cmake mv2

xnnpacktest.err.txt xnnpacktest.patch

Yeah thanks for giving it a try. #3382 doesn't change existing logic so that's why you still see the error. I'm going to merge this and add an actual fix on top of it, with proper CI.

[larryliu0820]

Sent out #3449 to fix it

[robell]

Thanks @larryliu0820 that fixed my problems in #3056 and the xnnpack flow works for me too. 👍