Skip to content

Fix markup in generics specification #1900

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 16, 2024
Merged

Fix markup in generics specification #1900

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/spec/generics.rst
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ There are several ways to define a user-defined class as generic:

* Include a ``Generic`` base class.
* Use the new generic class syntax in Python 3.12 and higher.
* Include a `` Protocol`` base class parameterized with type variables. This
* Include a ``Protocol`` base class parameterized with type variables. This
approach also marks the class as a protocol - see
:ref:`generic protocols<generic-protocols>` for more information.
* Include a generic base class parameterized with type variables.
Expand Down
Loading