Review README.md for relevance and importance

[gvanrossum]

@emilyemorehouse If you want more ideas for editorial work, I suspect that the README.md could probably be improved for new users by reordering some things and perhaps removing some things?

[gvanrossum]

(Also CONTRIBUTING.md.)

[srittau]

@gvanrossum Is this bug still relevant?

[gvanrossum]

Have you carefully reviewed those files? If you see no need for changes you can close it.

On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 6:51 AM Sebastian Rittau ***@***.***> wrote: @gvanrossum <https://github.com/gvanrossum> Is this bug still relevant? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1297 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACwrMiOMr3148_zxONTFZng3btDNTh_wks5unHvRgaJpZM4Ni-hd> .

-- --Guido (mobile)

[hauntsaninja]

CONTRIBUTING.md and README.md recently got some love as part of #4132 and #3727, and have seen many changes since this issue was opened. The current state seems reasonable to me, but happy to reopen if anyone sees things that can be improved.