Skip to content

test_concurrent_futures: Remove unneeded/confusing format call #93119

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 19, 2022
Merged

test_concurrent_futures: Remove unneeded/confusing format call #93119

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 19, 2022

Conversation

The-Compiler
Copy link
Contributor

Added in 339fd46 (GH-18057) by @aeros - but as noted in a comment, the test only tests ThreadPoolExecutor. Thus, I'm assuming that was a copy-paste mistake.

I believe this is simple enough to not need an issue/news entry.

(Found by running flake8 over Lib/ out of curiosity, see #93010 (comment))

Added in 339fd46 - but as noted in a comment, the test only tests ThreadPoolExecutor.
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added tests Tests in the Lib/test dir awaiting review labels May 23, 2022
@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra added needs backport to 3.10 only security fixes needs backport to 3.11 only security fixes labels Jul 19, 2022
@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra merged commit 3f2dd0a into python:main Jul 19, 2022
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @The-Compiler for the PR, and @JelleZijlstra for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.10, 3.11.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2022
…-93119)

Added in 339fd46 - but as noted in a comment, the test only tests ThreadPoolExecutor.
(cherry picked from commit 3f2dd0a)

Co-authored-by: Florian Bruhin <[email protected]>
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-94993 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.11 branch.

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the needs backport to 3.11 only security fixes label Jul 19, 2022
miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2022
…-93119)

Added in 339fd46 - but as noted in a comment, the test only tests ThreadPoolExecutor.
(cherry picked from commit 3f2dd0a)

Co-authored-by: Florian Bruhin <[email protected]>
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-94994 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.10 branch.

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the needs backport to 3.10 only security fixes label Jul 19, 2022
miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2022
Added in 339fd46 - but as noted in a comment, the test only tests ThreadPoolExecutor.
(cherry picked from commit 3f2dd0a)

Co-authored-by: Florian Bruhin <[email protected]>
miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2022
Added in 339fd46 - but as noted in a comment, the test only tests ThreadPoolExecutor.
(cherry picked from commit 3f2dd0a)

Co-authored-by: Florian Bruhin <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
skip issue skip news tests Tests in the Lib/test dir
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants