[3.10] gh-90622: Do not spawn ProcessPool workers on demand via the "fork" spawn method (GH-91598) #92497
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… fork method. (pythonGH-91598) Do not spawn ProcessPool workers on demand when they spawn via fork. This avoids potential deadlocks in the child processes due to forking from a multithreaded process.. (cherry picked from commit ebb37fc) Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <[email protected]>
gpshead
added
type-bug
|
Thanks @gpshead for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.9. |
miss-islington
pushed a commit
to miss-islington/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
May 8, 2022
… fork method. (pythonGH-91598) (pythonGH-92497) Do not spawn ProcessPool workers on demand when they spawn via fork. This avoids potential deadlocks in the child processes due to forking from a multithreaded process.. (cherry picked from commit ebb37fc) Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit b795376) Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <[email protected]>
|
GH-92499 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.9 branch. |
gpshead
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 8, 2022
…method. (GH-91598) (GH-92497) (#92499) Do not spawn ProcessPool workers on demand when they spawn via fork. This avoids potential deadlocks in the child processes due to forking from a multithreaded process.. (cherry picked from commit ebb37fc) Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit b795376) Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <[email protected]>
hello-adam
pushed a commit
to hello-adam/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 2, 2022
… fork method. (pythonGH-91598) (pythonGH-92497) (python#92499) Do not spawn ProcessPool workers on demand when they spawn via fork. This avoids potential deadlocks in the child processes due to forking from a multithreaded process.. (cherry picked from commit ebb37fc) Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit b795376) Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Do not spawn ProcessPool workers on demand when they spawn via fork.
This avoids potential deadlocks in the child processes due to forking from
a multithreaded process..
(cherry picked from commit ebb37fc)
Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith [email protected]