[3.7] bpo-33365: print the header values beside the keys (GH-6611) #7792
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
with debuglevel=1 only the header keys got printed. With this change the header values get printed as well and the single header entries get '\n' as a separator. (cherry picked from commit 936f03e) Co-authored-by: Marco Strigl <[email protected]>
|
@lethliel and @serhiy-storchaka: Backport status check is done, and it's a success ✅ . |
1 similar comment
|
@lethliel and @serhiy-storchaka: Backport status check is done, and it's a success ✅ . |
serhiy-storchaka
approved these changes
Jun 19, 2018
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
with debuglevel=1 only the header keys got printed. With
this change the header values get printed as well and the single
header entries get '\n' as a separator.
(cherry picked from commit 936f03e)
Co-authored-by: Marco Strigl [email protected]
https://bugs.python.org/issue33365