Skip to content

bpo-31724: Skip test_xmlrpc_net #3921

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 8, 2017
Merged

Conversation

zware
Copy link
Member

@zware zware commented Oct 8, 2017

With the upgrade of buildbot.python.org from Buildbot 0.8.x to 0.9.x,
the xmlrpc interface has been removed. This test is now skipped until
it can be rewritten to query a suitable substitute.

https://bugs.python.org/issue31724

With the upgrade of buildbot.python.org from Buildbot 0.8.x to 0.9.x,
the xmlrpc interface has been removed.  This test is now skipped until
it can be rewritten to query a suitable substitute.
@zware
Copy link
Member Author

zware commented Oct 8, 2017

I have actually hacked together a temporary fix on buildbot.python.org to mitigate this, but as it's temporary and I'd like to test the buildbots I'm merging this anyway.

@zware zware merged commit 73ffd3f into python:master Oct 8, 2017
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @zware for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 2.7, 3.6.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@zware zware deleted the skip_xmlrpc_net branch October 8, 2017 06:31
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-3922 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.6 branch.

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2017
With the upgrade of buildbot.python.org from Buildbot 0.8.x to 0.9.x,
the xmlrpc interface has been removed.  This test is now skipped until
it can be rewritten to query a suitable substitute.
(cherry picked from commit 73ffd3f)
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry, @zware, I could not cleanly backport this to 2.7 due to a conflict.
Please backport using cherry_picker on command line.
cherry_picker 73ffd3f2036179ed54591ef0455e5ba5694ae5bd 2.7

@zware
Copy link
Member Author

zware commented Oct 8, 2017

Apparently it doesn't need backport to 2.7; the test doesn't exist there.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants