Skip to content

[3.9] Docstring: replace pysqlite with sqlite3 (GH-31758) #31778

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 9, 2022

Conversation

JelleZijlstra
Copy link
Member

Replace two instances of "pysqlite" with "sqlite3" in sqlite3
docstrings. Also reword "is a no-op" to "does nothing" for clarity..
(cherry picked from commit b33a1ae)

Co-authored-by: Erlend Egeberg Aasland [email protected]

Replace two instances of "pysqlite" with "sqlite3" in sqlite3
docstrings. Also reword "is a no-op" to "does nothing" for clarity..
(cherry picked from commit b33a1ae)

Co-authored-by: Erlend Egeberg Aasland <[email protected]>
@@ -882,7 +882,7 @@ static PyMethodDef cursor_methods[] = {
{"executemany", (PyCFunction)pysqlite_cursor_executemany, METH_VARARGS,
PyDoc_STR("Repeatedly executes a SQL statement.")},
{"executescript", (PyCFunction)pysqlite_cursor_executescript, METH_VARARGS,
PyDoc_STR("Executes a multiple SQL statements at once.")},
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was already fixed on 3.10

@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra self-assigned this Mar 9, 2022
@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra merged commit 0c47008 into python:3.9 Mar 9, 2022
@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra deleted the backport-b33a1ae-3.9 branch March 9, 2022 18:19
hello-adam pushed a commit to hello-adam/cpython that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2022
…onGH-31778)

Replace two instances of "pysqlite" with "sqlite3" in sqlite3
docstrings. Also reword "is a no-op" to "does nothing" for clarity..
(cherry picked from commit b33a1ae)

Co-authored-by: Erlend Egeberg Aasland <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants