Skip to content

[3.10] Improve discussion about how __getattr__ is invoked. (GH-31435) #31437

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 20, 2022
Merged

[3.10] Improve discussion about how __getattr__ is invoked. (GH-31435) #31437

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 20, 2022

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

(cherry picked from commit 12a2e41)

Co-authored-by: Raymond Hettinger [email protected]

@rhettinger @miss-islington
Improve discussion about how __getattr__ is invoked. (pythonGH-31435)
b1a126a 
(cherry picked from commit 12a2e41)

Co-authored-by: Raymond Hettinger <[email protected]>
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip issue skip news labels Feb 20, 2022
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot mentioned this pull request Feb 20, 2022
Merged
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rhettinger: Status check is done, and it's a failure ❌ .

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rhettinger: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@rhettinger rhettinger merged commit ea3e042 into python:3.10 Feb 20, 2022
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-12a2e41-3.10 branch February 20, 2022 05:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip issue skip news
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@miss-islington @rhettinger @the-knights-who-say-ni @bedevere-bot