bpo-45615: Add missing test for printing traceback for non-exception. Fix… #30091
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… traceback.py to raise TypeError instead of AttributeError
iritkatriel
changed the title
sobolevn
approved these changes
Dec 13, 2021
iritkatriel
requested review from
pablogsal and
erlend-aasland
and removed request for
serhiy-storchaka
Misc/NEWS.d/next/Library/2021-12-13-15-51-16.bpo-45615.hVx83Q.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Erlend Egeberg Aasland <[email protected]>
erlend-aasland
approved these changes
Jan 2, 2022
|
Thank you @sobolevn and @erlend-aasland |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
… traceback.py to raise TypeError instead of AttributeError
This gap was discovered via code coverage. The testcapi function checked the type, so it didn't give the C traceback a chance to see the error. I removed that so the C code is now covered.
The python traceback wasn't handling this error well, that's fixed here.
https://bugs.python.org/issue45615