Skip to content

bpo-29602: fix signed zero handling in complex constructor #204

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 20, 2017

Conversation

mdickinson
Copy link
Member

Backport of #203 to 2.7 branch (cherry-pick of 112ec38).

@mdickinson mdickinson added type-bug An unexpected behavior, bug, or error cherry-pick for 2.7 labels Feb 20, 2017
Copy link
Member

@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wrong issue number. Otherwise LGTM.

@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka changed the title bpo-29549: fix signed zero handling in complex constructor bpo-29602: fix signed zero handling in complex constructor Feb 20, 2017
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 20, 2017

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (2.7@7131a73). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##             2.7     #204   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage       ?   83.38%           
======================================
  Files          ?     1367           
  Lines          ?   344903           
  Branches       ?        0           
======================================
  Hits           ?   287604           
  Misses         ?    57299           
  Partials       ?        0

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7131a73...23e14d6. Read the comment docs.

@mdickinson
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks, @serhiy-storchaka. Two more on the way ...

@mdickinson mdickinson merged commit c0b336e into 2.7 Feb 20, 2017
@mdickinson mdickinson deleted the bpo-29549-backport branch February 20, 2017 21:14
akruis pushed a commit to akruis/cpython that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2019
…ain tasklet

Fix issue python#204 and bpo-24596. Now the special SystemExit handling is used
for non-main tasklets of the main-thread of the primary interpreter only.
A test case is in upstream commit d8cba5d (not yet merged).
akruis pushed a commit to akruis/cpython that referenced this pull request Jan 20, 2019
…ain tasklet

Fix issue python#204 and bpo-24596. Now the special SystemExit handling is used
for non-main tasklets of the main-thread of the primary interpreter only.
A test case is in upstream commit e1ebf51 (not yet merged).

(cherry picked from commit 34768b4)
jaraco pushed a commit to jaraco/cpython that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type-bug An unexpected behavior, bug, or error
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants