Skip to content

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Jan 12, 2020

Although the underlying libffi issue remains open, adding these
checks have caused problems in third-party projects which are in
widespread use. See the issue for examples.

The corresponding tests have also been skipped.
(cherry picked from commit c12440c)

Co-authored-by: Vinay Sajip [email protected]

https://bugs.python.org/issue16575

…thonGH-17960)

Although the underlying libffi issue remains open, adding these
checks have caused problems in third-party projects which are in
widespread use. See the issue for examples.

The corresponding tests have also been skipped.
(cherry picked from commit c12440c)

Co-authored-by: Vinay Sajip <[email protected]>
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@vsajip: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@vsajip vsajip merged commit eb9ba2f into python:3.8 Jan 12, 2020
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-c12440c-3.8 branch January 12, 2020 11:41
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@vsajip: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

1 similar comment
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@vsajip: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@arigo arigo mannequin mentioned this pull request Apr 10, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
skip news type-bug An unexpected behavior, bug, or error
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants