Skip to content

[3.8] bpo-38422: Clarify docstrings of pathlib suffix(es) (GH-16679) #17031

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 2, 2019

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Nov 2, 2019

Whenever I use path.suffix I have to check again whether it includes the dot or not. I decided to add it to the docstring so I won't have to keep checking.

https://bugs.python.org/issue38422

Automerge-Triggered-By: @pitrou
(cherry picked from commit 8d4fef4)

Co-authored-by: Ram Rachum [email protected]

https://bugs.python.org/issue38422

Automerge-Triggered-By: @pitrou

Whenever I use `path.suffix` I have to check again whether it includes the dot or not. I decided to add it to the docstring so I won't have to keep checking.

https://bugs.python.org/issue38422

Automerge-Triggered-By: @pitrou
(cherry picked from commit 8d4fef4)

Co-authored-by: Ram Rachum <[email protected]>
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cool-RR: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington miss-islington merged commit aa1fee8 into python:3.8 Nov 2, 2019
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-8d4fef4-3.8 branch November 2, 2019 17:04
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cool-RR: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

1 similar comment
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cool-RR: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants