gh-118401: Docs: Use Sphinx short options #118403
Merged
+1
−1
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Yeah I think it would be much less disruptive if we changed this to long options when the old version also supports it. |
gaogaotiantian
approved these changes
Apr 29, 2024
|
Thanks @hugovk for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.12. |
miss-islington
pushed a commit
to miss-islington/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 29, 2024
(cherry picked from commit ee3413c) Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade <[email protected]>
|
GH-118407 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.12 branch. |
hugovk
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 29, 2024
Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
On PRs which haven't synced with
mainyet, they're still installing Sphinx 7.2 instead of 7.3. That's fine.But when the CI runs, GitHub is using the workflow from
mainthat has the 7.3-only long options, and not the workflow from their own branch that has the 7.2-and-7.3 short options. This is surprising.Quick fix: they can update their PR branches with
main, but this will be disruptive for more PRs.Better fix: keep short options in the workflow for longer, perhaps until we upgrade Sphinx to 7.4 or 8.0.