-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.2k
Supply Distribution.locate_file, honoring the abstract method. #11685
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
ichard26
merged 4 commits into
pypa:main
from
jaraco:bugfix/11684-implement-locate-file
Jan 12, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a59ffc6
Supply Distribution.locate_file, honoring the abstract method. Fixes …
jaraco 0d596aa
Merge branch 'main' into bugfix/11684-implement-locate-file
sbidoul a15d958
Merge branch 'main' into bugfix/11684-implement-locate-file
ichard26 255312e
Add type annotations + comment
ichard26 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This broke 3.8 & 3.9 compatibility in the 25.0 release:
A
from __future__ import annotations
is needed to fix.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ugh, this didn't fail in CI as the importlib-metadata backend isn't used on Python 3.10 or lower. Sorry about this!
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Aha, this file should ~never be imported though unless under Python 3.11+ due to checks in
src/pip/_internal/metadata/__init__.py
.I can concoct this failure:
But that seems pretty artificial. I'll investigate more how I'm hitting this codepath without exporting
_PIP_USE_IMPORTLIB_METADATA=True
and only file an issue if I find a real one along those lines.Sorry for the noise.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So @ichard26 and @sbidoul I don't think this is actually a real bug that any reasonable use can hit. My
_PIP_USE_IMPORTLIB_METADATA=True
force is ... forced and the original case I got here from was my own PEBKAC.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also, what was I thinking? The union operator also doesn't work under Python 3.10. Anyway, a fix is up: #13181
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @ichard26.