back to "package" #115
Merged
back to "package" #115
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
source/installing.rst
Outdated
Member
|
One cross reference that doesn't look right, one minor suggested tweak. In reviewing this, I also noticed that the glossary entry for package meaning number 1 is slightly outdated - it doesn't account for the native namespace package import support added in Python 3.3 (which does away with the need for init.py files). Also related: even if we don't use them elsewhere yet, perhaps it would be worth mentioning the optional "import package" and "distribution package" qualifiers in their respective glossary entries? |
Contributor
Author
ok, let me try to work them into the glossary. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
based on the consensus I perceived in #106 (at least between 3 people) to go back to using "package" (not "distribution" or "distribution package")
note that I added an opening paragraph to the installation tutorial explaining the ambiguity.
the glossary stayed as it is with the "Meaning #1/#2"" distinction for "Package"